Who Invented Foxes?
News: After almost six months of operation and many dozens of rejections, we have finally received our first real submission from the WIF Android app!
Posted by Wrongfellow on 11 May 2015.
All   Business   Computers   History   Incoherent   Nature   News   People   Politics   Science   Sport   Travel   Typos   WTF?

Recent additions in Science

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Albert Einstein)

Create an account and log in to comment and vote on submissions.


Quiz show host: "What does five squared equal?"
Contestant: "In my day it was 5x5, but I wonder if it may be the same as five cubed now..."
    Posted by JT on 20 Dec 2010. + (2) - (0) Permalink

"If people like you had their way we would never have invented planes (its impossible to fly...duh) And while your at it learn to spell."

    (From http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/...)
    Posted by JT on 7 Dec 2010. + (3) - (0) Permalink
IIIIIIIIIRONY
    Posted by CheddarBBQ on 7 Dec 2010.

"Can I get AIDS from swimming with black people?" (Enter "Can I get AIDS from" into Google and see for yourself)
    Posted by JT on 2 Dec 2010. + (3) - (0) Permalink
Well, possibly. Are you swimming in Africa?
    Posted by CheddarBBQ on 5 Dec 2010.

"Musical instrumental gestures are actuations of a musical instrument by direct human control (typically by kinetic neuro-muscular actuation)."
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 29 Oct 2010. + (0) - (0) Permalink
From this paper: http://opensoundcontrol.org/publicati...

A few more of these and we'll need an "Academia" category, perhaps.
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 29 Oct 2010.
Too many big words.
    Posted by CheddarBBQ on 29 Oct 2010.
Far too many! It's perfectly easy to say nothing with a lot more brevity than that. :)

Scientists don't try to use artists' jargon in their papers - I have to wonder why artists use science jargon - maybe they think it makes them look clever? :)
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 30 Oct 2010.

No, it wasn't current, it was amps.
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 13 Oct 2010. + (1) - (0) Permalink

"Most genes in the genome are inherited from either father or mother"
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 8 Oct 2010. + (4) - (0) Permalink
"Most"?
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 8 Oct 2010.
Don't forget the genes from Uncle Carl.
    Posted by CheddarBBQ on 9 Oct 2010.
And Aunt Creepy.
    Posted by Tiger on 12 Dec 2010.

"There is no obvious connection to explain why a theory that is being developed to describe the fundamental workings of our universe is useful for predicting the behaviour of entangled quantum systems."
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 3 Sep 2010. + (2) - (0) Permalink
Really?
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 3 Sep 2010.
...what?
    Posted by CheddarBBQ on 1 Oct 2010.

"If a man can walk 3 miles in an hour, and then discovers he can travel faster, is this a bit like time travel?

Say the basis for making a journey is walking speed, and this is world wide. Then someone creates a device or machine that can make the journey more quickly isn't this a form of travelling through time into the future?

If you imagine a car is a time machine - through the rear windscreen is the past, through the front windscreen is the future and in the car is the present. Through the side windows is the present as it happens in all across the universe.

The car gets you to the future more quickly."
    Posted by JT on 4 Aug 2010. + (1) - (0) Permalink
Feet are time machines too, you know.
    Posted by Socky on 17 Aug 2010.

"OK got a science question for ya. My little boy and I was looking at the stars and saw a falling star. I know you already think Im nuts!! So anyways my question is Why are the falling stars never the ones in the constellations? Maybe I wasnt paying attention in class!!!"
    Posted by JT on 11 Jul 2010. + (4) - (0) Permalink

"I don't believe Nature could produce that level of detail..." (So-called "expert" attempting to argue that so-called "photographic evidence" of a so-called "ghost" must prove conclusively that ghosts "exist" because Nature is apparently incapable of producing anything so detailed as a human face).
    Posted by JT on 1 Jun 2010. + (3) - (0) Permalink
He's a creationist!
    Posted by Socky on 1 Jun 2010.
Well, obviously. Only God can create a human face. If you believe Nature could have done it, you must be one of those evil pagans.
    Posted by Wrongfellow on 1 Jun 2010.